What is Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Analysis?

Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Analysis

Top-down analysis starts with macro trends before drilling into specific instruments, while bottom-up analysis focuses on micro factors first. Successful traders understand when to emphasize each approach.

Choosing the Right Lens

Macro-focused swing traders often lead with top-down, using interest rates, growth data, and policy outlooks. Micro-focused traders might start bottom-up, analyzing order flow or company-specific news before considering macro context.

Consistency Matters

Document your analytical sequence to avoid cherry-picking evidence. Teams can allocate responsibilities—macro analysts identify themes while execution traders handle bottom-up timing.

Practical Playbook

• Define context on higher timeframes, then execute on intraday charts.
• Wait for confirmation (acceptance, momentum, or confluence) before entry.
• Size positions conservatively and place stops at clear invalidation levels.
• Adapt to session dynamics; conditions shift between Asia, London, and New York.

Common Pitfalls

• Forcing trades without alignment across timeframe, structure, and catalyst.
• Ignoring spreads/slippage during news or thin liquidity.
• Moving stops or adding to losers instead of honoring the plan.

Illustrative Example

Build a simple playbook: identify bias, mark key zones/levels, define triggers and invalidation, and pre‑set targets for 2–3R. Journal results by session and setup to refine rules. Over time, consistency—not prediction—drives outcomes.

Practical Playbook

• Define context on higher timeframes, then execute on intraday charts.
• Wait for confirmation (acceptance, momentum, or confluence) before entry.
• Size positions conservatively and place stops at clear invalidation levels.
• Adapt to session dynamics; conditions shift between Asia, London, and New York.

Common Pitfalls

• Forcing trades without alignment across timeframe, structure, and catalyst.
• Ignoring spreads/slippage during news or thin liquidity.
• Moving stops or adding to losers instead of honoring the plan.

Illustrative Example

Build a simple playbook: identify bias, mark key zones/levels, define triggers and invalidation, and pre‑set targets for 2–3R. Journal results by session and setup to refine rules. Over time, consistency—not prediction—drives outcomes.